‘No More Blood For Oil’: Protester Interrupts MSNBC Debate Coverage

The protester got through the barricade surrounding the MSNBC set outside Drexel University, site of Tuesday's Democratic debate.

October 31, 2007 at 3:50 am - MSNBC
Dateline: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

[...] Variety.com * wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptliverail_video_157ec2d89b133b57031a(”1″, “1″, “1″, 450, 382); [...]

MMS   October 31st, 2007 - 6:38 am

And the democrats call fox news biased? Give me a break

Mr Schlumberger   October 31st, 2007 - 8:01 am

I bet sending in that protester was an inside job set up by Chris Matthews. At least this week, he’ll be watched by 2 times more people than every other week, that loser. If there was any truth to the “premise” of blood for oil, the price of a barrel would be $40, dontcha think?
Typical liberal slop.

seejay   October 31st, 2007 - 9:41 am

I think SOMEONE is going to TAKE a BUNCH of oil.
If that someone isn’t us, it will be the Chinese.

seejay   October 31st, 2007 - 9:49 am

Chrissy says she “agrees with the sentement.”
Maybe he could explain to us dim bulbs just who traded the blood for the oil? GWB? Where’d he put the oil? Did the USA nationalize some oil-fields I don’t know about?
Exxon? Mobile? Where’d they get the blood for the trade?
And the other side? Can you run a combustion engine on blood?
I look forward to the day we begin to actually call people on manipulative speech. “Swiftboating.” “Racist.” “Homophobe.” None of these terms have ANY DEFINITION, yet today they are a major part of our lexicon; Or should I say LAXICON!

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.